Devin Stone never intended to become one of the internet’s most recognizable legal analysts. Instead, he was supposed to follow a predictable path: graduate, grind it out in Big Law, make partner, and spend the next several decades enjoying a conventionally successful career as a lawyer.
But a bout of burnout early in Stone’s career led him to YouTube, where he started publishing explainer videos under the name Legal Eagle. Stone’s channel, which now boasts nearly 4 million followers, started out pretty fluffy, with videos dissecting legal representations on popular TV shows and movies becoming an early audience favorite. While those turned him into a prominent online influencer—yes, there’s at least one for pretty much everything these days—Stone has more recently become a figure both beloved and detested for his prolific video explainers of the Trump presidency’s various legal quagmires and the constitutional crises they’re creating.
What Stone now does, I would argue, is something closer to public service journalism in a YouTube-optimized wrapper: He and his team publish upward of three videos a week unpacking everything from FCC censorship to Trump’s invasion of Venezuela, and often reach more than half a million viewers with a single episode.
Stone, who remains a practicing lawyer and teaches at Georgetown University, sat down with me to talk about the unique career he’s built for himself—and the particularly precarious legal moment Americans find themselves in. In our conversation, he describes the explosion of legal crises wrought by the Trump administration, talks about building a business off the back of YouTube’s omnipotent algorithm, and explains why he worries that an entire generation may come to see unprecedented political behavior as table stakes.
KATIE DRUMMOND: Here with me now is the Legal Eagle himself, Devin Stone. Devin, welcome.
DEVIN STONE: Thanks for having me.
I wanted to start by letting our audience know that you are a real practicing lawyer. You’re also a law professor at Georgetown. You also have this enormously popular YouTube channel, so I am trying to triangulate how you get all of this done. But first, what made you deviate from a more conventional lawyer path to YouTube?
You spend a lot of years grinding away at a very large national law firm, where you get the best training in the world, and then when it comes to the time when you would be elevated to partner, you realize you are completely burned out and that it would be more fun to just make videos and post them to the internet.
You do a lot of very serious legal breakdowns on your channel. I want to talk about those, but first I want to talk about the fun stuff you do, like breaking down legal representations as they appear in film or on TV, like on Suits. I’m curious, who’s getting it right? Have you seen some really high-integrity examples?
Oh yeah, for sure. And I don’t want to give the impression that I don’t enjoy a ridiculous portrayal.
Of course, of course. For the record, I think Suits is probably one of my favorite TV shows.
OK, I’ll tread lightly. Suits is not gonna make it into my list.
Bummer.
I would say that the TV show that stands out the most is Better Call Saul.
They really did their homework in terms of making sure that what they were doing was very legally accurate. And honestly, I don’t think the show needed that. They could have taken a lot more liberties than they actually did. But honestly, as a lawyer watching Breaking Bad and watching the adventures of Saul Goodman, I had another layer of enjoyment. So much of the drudgery of litigation, you know, pushing papers all day long and doing a lot of legal research, they actually did a lot of that stuff. The issues that they were dealing with really rang true as someone who, you know, has spent 12- and 13-hour days in front of a computer looking up code.
