Close Menu
Tech News VisionTech News Vision
  • Home
  • What’s On
  • Mobile
  • Computers
  • Gadgets
  • Apps
  • Gaming
  • How To
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Global
    • Press Release

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest tech news and updates directly to your inbox.

Trending Now
The White House Is Starting to Panic Over the Midterms

The White House Is Starting to Panic Over the Midterms

30 September 2026
GTA 5 Modder Taunts Rockstar With Unofficial Nintendo Switch Port, Gets Cease and Desist from Take-Two

GTA 5 Modder Taunts Rockstar With Unofficial Nintendo Switch Port, Gets Cease and Desist from Take-Two

30 September 2026
Amazon’s delivery driver smart glasses will reportedly take photos ‘almost constantly’

Amazon’s delivery driver smart glasses will reportedly take photos ‘almost constantly’

30 September 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest VKontakte
Tech News VisionTech News Vision
  • Home
  • What’s On
  • Mobile
  • Computers
  • Gadgets
  • Apps
  • Gaming
  • How To
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Global
    • Press Release
Tech News VisionTech News Vision
Home » Trump’s AI Safety ‘Accord’ Is a Fancy Pinky-Swear
What's On

Trump’s AI Safety ‘Accord’ Is a Fancy Pinky-Swear

News RoomBy News Room30 September 2026Updated:30 September 2026No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Trump’s AI Safety ‘Accord’ Is a Fancy Pinky-Swear

On Tuesday, executives for Google, Anthropic, Meta, OpenAI, xAI, and Nvidia all signed “The White House Accord on Super Intelligence,” which was announced following a luncheon held by President Donald Trump.

The effort was an act of “tremendous self-regulation,” as Trump put it, but the agreement is not the sweeping AI regulation that people inside the companies themselves have been asking for. And while failing to honor these public commitments could count as illegally lying to consumers, even that wouldn’t be enough to trigger massive reforms.

The statement says that companies “should implement” several things: First, they should ensure they have “robust internal controls” to monitor their models’ capabilities and ability to not go rogue or hack things in unintended ways. Second, they should “empower” an internal team to do that work (and remediate when things go wrong). Third, it encourages them to partner with an external monitor who is “empowered” to do independent assessments to make sure that all of that work is happening. And finally, they should make sure their board of directors has set up a committee to receive reports about all of these efforts.

The voluntary commitments are some indication that the frontier labs are making an effort to figure out how to make products that are safe for the general public. However, if there were any hopes for a blanket blessing from the US government, those were quickly dashed after news broke that the Federal Trade Commission intends to investigate several AI companies over potential consumer protection issues.

The statement is the culmination of weeks of debate over AI regulation. It also follows frontier AI labs seeking an antitrust exemption so they can coordinate on safety work without regulatory scrutiny. (Notably, antitrust experts and practitioners say such an exemption is unneeded because AI ending humanity—which researchers have warned will come about if nothing is done—is arguably anti-competitive because humans are an essential part of any given marketplace.)

There’s been a lot of build-up to this particular statement, but this is not the first time that these companies have signed a voluntary agreement about their AI safety practices with a government. In early 2025, the United Kingdom and the Republic of Korea announced a set of “Frontier AI Safety Commitments,” which included promises about doing internal and external red-teaming of AI models for “severe and novel threats” and also “to work toward information sharing” on AI safety issues.

Google, Anthropic, Meta, OpenAI, xAI, and Nvidia did not respond to requests for comment. The White House also did not immediately respond.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

Here’s what AI leaders are saying about Trump’s new safety plan

Here’s what AI leaders are saying about Trump’s new safety plan

30 September 2026
Furry Airline Pilots Are Just Minding Their Own Business

Furry Airline Pilots Are Just Minding Their Own Business

30 September 2026
Google announces Gemini 4 and says it’s so capable that only ‘trusted cyber defenders’ can have it right now

Google announces Gemini 4 and says it’s so capable that only ‘trusted cyber defenders’ can have it right now

30 September 2026
The White House Is Starting to Panic Over the Midterms

The White House Is Starting to Panic Over the Midterms

30 September 2026
Editors Picks
Here’s what AI leaders are saying about Trump’s new safety plan

Here’s what AI leaders are saying about Trump’s new safety plan

30 September 2026
Furry Airline Pilots Are Just Minding Their Own Business

Furry Airline Pilots Are Just Minding Their Own Business

30 September 2026
24 Jump Street Gets December 2027 Release Date, Original Cast Returning

24 Jump Street Gets December 2027 Release Date, Original Cast Returning

30 September 2026
Google announces Gemini 4 and says it’s so capable that only ‘trusted cyber defenders’ can have it right now

Google announces Gemini 4 and says it’s so capable that only ‘trusted cyber defenders’ can have it right now

30 September 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest tech news and updates directly to your inbox.

Trending Now
Tech News Vision
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo YouTube
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact
© 2026 Tech News Vision. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.