Close Menu
Tech News VisionTech News Vision
  • Home
  • What’s On
  • Mobile
  • Computers
  • Gadgets
  • Apps
  • Gaming
  • How To
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Global
    • Press Release

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest tech news and updates directly to your inbox.

Trending Now

Sony Announces Limited-Period Discount on Audio Products in India for World Music Day

12 June 2025

Orlando Bloom Says He’d Love to See Legolas in Lord of the Rings: The Hunt for Gollum, but ‘AI Would Have to Come Into Play’

12 June 2025

Fujifilm’s new X-E5 is one of its sleekest mirrorless cameras yet

12 June 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest VKontakte
Tech News VisionTech News Vision
  • Home
  • What’s On
  • Mobile
  • Computers
  • Gadgets
  • Apps
  • Gaming
  • How To
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Global
    • Press Release
Tech News VisionTech News Vision
Home » Apple exec ‘outright lied’ during Epic trial
What's On

Apple exec ‘outright lied’ during Epic trial

News RoomBy News Room1 May 2025Updated:1 May 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

In her ruling banning Apple from charging a commission on purchases made outside the App Store, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers says that an Apple executive “outright lied under oath.”

According to Gonzalez Rogers, Alex Roman, vice president of finance at Apple, gave testimony that was “replete with misdirection and outright lies.” The judge writes that Roman lied when testifying that Apple hadn’t decided on the 27 percent number for its fee on purchases outside the App Store until January 16th, 2024.

“Contemporaneous business documents reveal that on the contrary, the main components of Apple’s plan, including the 27 percent commission, were determined in July 2023,” Gonzalez Rogers says. “Neither Apple, nor its counsel, corrected the, now obvious, lies.”

Gonzalez Rogers says that she is referring the case to a US attorney for possible criminal contempt proceedings against Apple and Roman.

“Apple willfully chose not to comply with this Court’s Injunction,” Gonzalez Rogers says at the end of the filing (emphasis hers). “It did so with the express intent to create new anticompetitive barriers which would, by design and in effect, maintain a valued revenue stream; a revenue stream previously found to be anticompetitive. That it thought this Court would tolerate such insubordination was a gross miscalculation. As always, the cover-up made it worse. For this Court, there is no second bite at the apple.”

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

From Networks to Business Models, AI Is Rewiring Telecom

12 June 2025

Review: Sony Bravia 8 II OLED TV

12 June 2025

Fujifilm’s new X-E5 is one of its sleekest mirrorless cameras yet

12 June 2025

Air Traffic Control in the US Still Runs on Windows 95 and Floppy Disks

12 June 2025
Editors Picks

Doctor Who Animated Spin-Off Announced While Main Show’s Future Unclear, Leaving Fans Wondering Who Will Play the Doctor — or if They’ll Even Appear

12 June 2025

From Networks to Business Models, AI Is Rewiring Telecom

12 June 2025

Review: Sony Bravia 8 II OLED TV

12 June 2025

Infinix GT 30 Pro 5G Now Available for Purchase in India: Price, Specifications, Offers

12 June 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest tech news and updates directly to your inbox.

Trending Now
Tech News Vision
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo YouTube
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact
© 2025 Tech News Vision. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.