Close Menu
Tech News VisionTech News Vision
  • Home
  • What’s On
  • Mobile
  • Computers
  • Gadgets
  • Apps
  • Gaming
  • How To
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Global
    • Press Release

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest tech news and updates directly to your inbox.

Trending Now

Jurassic World Rebirth Makes Scarlett Johansson the Highest Grossing Lead Actor Ever, Overtaking Marvel costars Robert Downey Jr. and Samuel L. Jackson

7 July 2025

Bluesky adds Twitter-like push notifications for specific accounts

7 July 2025

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE Global Variant Spotted on Geekbench With An Exynos 2400 SoC

7 July 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest VKontakte
Tech News VisionTech News Vision
  • Home
  • What’s On
  • Mobile
  • Computers
  • Gadgets
  • Apps
  • Gaming
  • How To
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Global
    • Press Release
Tech News VisionTech News Vision
Home » The Time Sam Altman Asked for a Countersurveillance Audit of OpenAI
What's On

The Time Sam Altman Asked for a Countersurveillance Audit of OpenAI

News RoomBy News Room21 May 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Dario Amodei’s AI safety contingent was growing disquieted with some of Sam Altman’s behaviors. Shortly after OpenAI’s Microsoft deal was inked in 2019, several of them were stunned to discover the extent of the promises that Altman had made to Microsoft for which technologies it would get access to in return for its investment. The terms of the deal didn’t align with what they had understood from Altman. If AI safety issues actually arose in OpenAI’s models, they worried, those commitments would make it far more difficult, if not impossible, to prevent the models’ deployment. Amodei’s contingent began to have serious doubts about Altman’s honesty.

“We’re all pragmatic people,” a person in the group says. “We’re obviously raising money; we’re going to do commercial stuff. It might look very reasonable if you’re someone who makes loads of deals like Sam, to be like, ‘All right, let’s make a deal, let’s trade a thing, we’re going to trade the next thing.’ And then if you are someone like me, you’re like, ‘We’re trading a thing we don’t fully understand.’ It feels like it commits us to an uncomfortable place.”

This was against the backdrop of a growing paranoia over different issues across the company. Within the AI safety contingent, it centered on what they saw as strengthening evidence that powerful misaligned systems could lead to disastrous outcomes. One bizarre experience in particular had left several of them somewhat nervous. In 2019, on a model trained after GPT‑2 with roughly twice the number of parameters, a group of researchers had begun advancing the AI safety work that Amodei had wanted: testing reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) as a way to guide the model toward generating cheerful and positive content and away from anything offensive.

But late one night, a researcher made an update that included a single typo in his code before leaving the RLHF process to run overnight. That typo was an important one: It was a minus sign flipped to a plus sign that made the RLHF process work in reverse, pushing GPT‑2 to generate more offensive content instead of less. By the next morning, the typo had wreaked its havoc, and GPT‑2 was completing every single prompt with extremely lewd and sexually explicit language. It was hilarious—and also concerning. After identifying the error, the researcher pushed a fix to OpenAI’s code base with a comment: Let’s not make a utility minimizer.

In part fueled by the realization that scaling alone could produce more AI advancements, many employees also worried about what would happen if different companies caught on to OpenAI’s secret. “The secret of how our stuff works can be written on a grain of rice,” they would say to each other, meaning the single word scale. For the same reason, they worried about powerful capabilities landing in the hands of bad actors. Leadership leaned into this fear, frequently raising the threat of China, Russia, and North Korea and emphasizing the need for AGI development to stay in the hands of a US organization. At times this rankled employees who were not American. During lunches, they would question, Why did it have to be a US organization? remembers a former employee. Why not one from Europe? Why not one from China?

During these heady discussions philosophizing about the long‑term implications of AI research, many employees returned often to Altman’s early analogies between OpenAI and the Manhattan Project. Was OpenAI really building the equivalent of a nuclear weapon? It was a strange contrast to the plucky, idealistic culture it had built thus far as a largely academic organization. On Fridays, employees would kick back after a long week for music and wine nights, unwinding to the soothing sounds of a rotating cast of colleagues playing the office piano late into the night.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

Microsoft’s Edge browser now loads sites even faster

7 July 2025

Tesla’s real struggles have only just begun

7 July 2025

Bluesky adds Twitter-like push notifications for specific accounts

7 July 2025

Epic reaches mystery settlement with Samsung days before new Galaxy phones

7 July 2025
Editors Picks

Microsoft’s Edge browser now loads sites even faster

7 July 2025

One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest May Get a New Television Adaptation From the Point of View of Chief

7 July 2025

Tesla’s real struggles have only just begun

7 July 2025

iPhone 17 Pro, iPhone 17 Pro Max Leaked Render Shows Repositioned Apple Logo, New MagSafe Design

7 July 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest tech news and updates directly to your inbox.

Trending Now
Tech News Vision
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo YouTube
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact
© 2025 Tech News Vision. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.